Showing posts with label Children. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Children. Show all posts

Thursday, July 14, 2016

Our History Textbooks Left Out the Section About Kids Menu (Food Know-It-All)

My belief is if you look at the backbone of your eating habits & food ideas, your family or whoever reared you is bracing it up. Think about it, how many "rules" about food have you carried over from your childhood to your adult life. I am typing this post and I literally hear a 10-year-old OUTSPOKEN_DIVA ask me the following questions:

  • Did we ever go to IHOP? Yes, when we get to college.
  • Remember those Hot Wings at Cousin Fran's wedding we finally had when we were 8, are they still around? Yes, there are now whole restaurants specializing in flavored wings
  • Do we still like Ravioli Casserole? Unfortunately, we do. But only once a year. (Now, I'm fighting a craving for Ravioli Casserole (Chef Boyardee with Cheddar Cheese mixed in), I've had it already this year. LOL Blame Public School Lunches)

Growing up, we didn't eat out often. Until I was 12, my home had three families(My Grandparents, My Mom & her 3 kids and My Youngest Aunt & her 2 kids) residing in it. Home Cooking was the best economical choice for our home. My grandmother cooked during the week and my aunt & my mom cooked on the weekends. Sometimes on Saturdays (once a month on a Friday), fast food or takeout was brought in. Eating out was rather special for us. We ate out

  • When we went out of town
  • When we went shopping with mom & grandparents (Easter, Back to School, Christmas)
  • Church Functions
  • If you were in the car when my grandfather decided to show off the latest restaurant he tried with the credit union board after Sunday church service
Now when going out to eat there were 4 rules.

  • Behave!!!
  • Don't order anything you can eat at home.
  • Anything you order, You Better Eat
  • If eating at a cafeteria or buffet, there should be two vegetable choices on your tray

I don't remember ever ordering off of any Kid's Menu at a Standard, Sit down restaurant. I was allowed to color but I remember ordering off the regular menu. My mother hated Kids Menus. "This is a Mexican restaurant, why is there a hamburger on the menu." "Who eats a plate of Macaroni & Cheese? Vegetarian Kids eat vegetables, too".
Once I could read I could see that everything on the kid's menu was stuff I could eat at home. Many of you may see that rule as being bougie or stuck up. I see it as not wasting money. 3.99 for a basic grilled cheese sandwich, fries & a drink that I probably ate already at school earlier in the week. Yeah, I was picking the taco plate off the regular menu. Now, I just heard my grandmother say, "And you better eat all of it". LoL

Once I got older I agreed with the food experts, nutritionists, dieticians & doctors in the 90s and beyond, Kids Menus needed a facelift. (Well, at least at Standard, Sit Down restaurants, I agreed. Healthy Fast Food is an Oxymoron, in my opinion. If people want their families to eat healthily, Don't Eat Fast Food.) I didn't understand why was there a Kids Menu.
Very few homes I knew of served separate dinners for the adults & the children. And all of those were because of medical requirements & extremely picky eaters. Most homes served everyone the same thing. Adults didn't eat chicken, dressing & green beans while the children eat corndogs & fries. In my own home, the only times the children ate something different than the adults were fried fish night (bone-in fish & fish sticks) and the chitterling meal for New Years (I still eat a separate dinner). So, why do restaurants have a separate and not so equal menu? I finally learned why.

What we know of public children & youth dining in America started with the Volstead Act (The Act to prohibit intoxicating beverages, and to regulate the manufacture, production, use, and sale of alcohol). In the century leading up to the dry laws, children rarely ate out. Only the children of well off families ate out or stay in hotels Restaurants not attached to hotels didn’t even serve children, because they got in the way of boozy grown-up fun. Prohibition took effect in January 1920, the dry laws forced the hospitality industry to rethink its policy on children: The Waldorf-Astoria in New York in 1921 became one of the first establishments to beckon to children with a menu of their very own. But even as restaurants began to invite children in, it was with a new limitation: They could no longer eat what their parents ate.


The earliest children’s menus didn’t look so different from the playful ones we know today. The Waldorf-Astoria put Little Jack Horner on the cover of their pink-and-cream booklet; as he pulls out his plummy thumb, a dish runs away with a spoon. But then there was the food—the bland, practically basic food. There was flaked chicken over boiled rice, mixed green vegetables in butter; a splat of prune whip. And the one dish that appeared without exception, the chicken nugget of the Jazz Age was a plain broiled lamb chop.
A pediatrician Emmett Holt, first published a book called The Care and Feeding of Children, in 1894, it stayed in print for nearly half a century, teaching mothers, nurses, and, apparently, chefs that young children weren’t to be given fresh fruits, nuts, or raisins in their rice pudding. Pies, tarts, and indeed "pastry of every description" were "especially forbidden," and for no reason were such items as ham, bacon, corn, cod, tomato soup, or lemonade to pass a child's lips before his 10th birthday. Holt didn’t explain his guidelines but it this medley of medicine and morality that still dictated the first 20 years of children’s menus. Restaurants packed them with everything Emmett Holt said to, and they did it proudly.

Then came Dr. Spock with the 1946 publication of Baby and Child Care. Benjamin Spock succeeded Emmett Holt as the nation’s chief childrearing expert which emphasized nurture over discipline. But, for all the collective relaxing over children’s diets in the postwar years, the children’s menu was not abandoned.
Look at those prices
Restaurants were now dependent on its marketing benefits; children didn’t want to give up booklets that doubled as clown masks or featured punch-out airplanes; and parents, quite understandably, had become attached to the low prices. So the children’s menu persisted. Meanwhile, a growing processed-food industry made it powerfully cost-effective to rewrite. By the 1970s, the children’s menu as we know it today was basically in place: The design was as colorful as ever, but the food had been restricted to its present-day palette of browns and yellows.

Again as we see now, our little ones eat a little healthier in restaurants. They at least have a variety of choices, now.

French Fries have a new buddy, Garden Salad & Broccoli with the Grilled Cheese meal. Yes, I've shared this information with my mother. She was shocked that the practice went back so far.
She didn't eat in restaurants until she was an older teenager. (Jim Crow, Segregation, the 1960s) Meals were home-cooked or takeout, only back then for my family. And with this new knowledge she now just dislike not hate Kids Menus. She wishes that would be abolished and parents teach their kids how to make food choices in restaurants. Well, Like Mother, Like Daughter!!!

As Always, Talking to You in Adult Terms

Tuesday, July 21, 2015

Darla Neugebauer!!!


Okay if you are not caught up go read THIS and then come back.

*tuh*

In my opinion, that diner owner should not be sorry. I am ever in Maine, I will be stopping into her diner. After 15 minutes, I would've yelled at the parents. I'm sorry but children do not learn how to behave in public if you allow them to go crazy. If they don't feel well, stay home. That is Not fair to others trying to eat, shop, ect in peace.


Three things I Hate, Yes Hate for children to do in Restaurants, Planes & Stores.
1.Irate Screaming
2. Running Around
3. Kneeling in a chair 

I'm not saying that children should not be allowed to dine at restaurants. I just think they should not be allowed to run a muck in public.  I'm not saying you should vigilante smack any & all unruly children. That is going to far. I actually don't talk to the children of strangers. After I survey the situation (The child might have special needs or the child is screaming because the parent disciplined them, in which I understand & say nothing) I speak to the parent(s). Recently in a Big Box store, two children kept running in front of everyone's carts causing a ruckus. Finally I turned to the parents or adults they were with and said, "This is how your kids are going to get knocked the heck out off. They are running in front of everyone causing problems." I walked off not worrying about their reactions. I just know those little girls were not running around anymore. 


And this is not a race or culture issue. In my black family, I have a younger cousin who kneeled everywhere she ate. One family event, I made her sit on her bottom and I never said it again. Even my nephew has to be told to stand where I can see him from time to time in the store. So before someone say that it's that race or that race let stop you, Every Race of Children acts up in public from time to time. It is up to the Adults to help them to behave properly.


That is one of the reasons why I am Not a parent. Parenting, in my opinion is the raising the next generation to be viable citizens of the world. That is a daunting task. And letting a child scream for almost an hour at a restaurant is not leading her to be a good inhabitant. Ignoring cries also says those parents are selfish people also. They were not being fair to the other diners or the owner. The diner owner didn't curse at the child. She didn't even put them out. *slow clap" to Darla Neugebauer. Yes, it is easier when somebody else does it. But you did it and I respect you for it. 

As Always, Talking to You in Adult Terms

Friday, January 10, 2014

*side eye* Barnes & Noble... Get it Together

Child Finds Porn On Bookstore E-Reader « CBS Dallas / Fort Worth

I must really like you guys because I was web searching for this article after hearing it on the news and I know my internet use is being monitored. No LoL's. Dear U.S. Government, as you can clearly see I was looking for a article not looking up pictures of children in a lewd way.

Okay so here in a North Texas Barnes & Noble store a parent saw their 4 year old child looking at porn on a demo Nook in the children's area of the bookstore. The parent was outraged and took to social media to issue a warning. The store Execs issued an apology & confirmed the demo Nooks have no filtered controls on them.

What the Heck??? What is Barnes & Nobles and any other stores that are doing this thinking about? Public libraries, government agencies & schools block sensitive materials that can be found on the web. Why can't a public store not do the same? Oh I came up with several ways how the porn ended up on the demo Nook in the first place. 1) Some pervert looked it up in the children's area just to get his jollies off. 2) Some one with hacker potential, looked it up just to see if Barnes & Noble had it blocked. 3) Some curious preteen, caught his parent(s) not looking and went to a site he heard his peers talk about. Now I could come up with that many reasons how the porn was even on the Nook, Barnes & Noble has not good excuse why they didn't foresee this issue. This is not a vanilla world. Too much known crap is out here not to anticipate all possible problems. I don't understand how any of the demo Nooks were able to have access to any porn, governmental sites, banking websites, etc., etc. No one who visit your sore should be able to access sensitive areas of the net. That is common sense.

So Barnes and Noble and other public places not using Internet Filter controls, Shame, Shame, Shame on you for being stupid. No one comes to your store wanting to see porn. Get it together, you have a brand to protect. Get some Firewalls.

As Always Talking to You in Adult Terms

Tuesday, September 25, 2012

Paddling Not Abuse

Well in Springtown, TX (Parker County) two teenage girls were paddled by a male assistant principal for wrong doings. The school had permission by the parents but by school policy the male was not suppose to spank the females. If that is policy then I agree. Also the girls' paddling resulted in bruising on their bottoms. Most men have the ability to hit harder than women. So yeah that was a terrible thing. But the reactions from this is worse.

I'm a Spare the Rod, Spoil the Child depending on situation type non-parent. And to hear people complaints about corporal punishment is lost on me most times. Because some of these complaints are reaching. One woman said that the Male assistant principal paddling the Girls was teaching Boys It's Okay to hit Girls. WHOA! That is a bit much, IMO. I can't agree with that.

Okay so a father shouldn't spank his daughter if warranted because it teaching domestic violence is right. UMM NO! Parents are EQUALS. Parents & Children are NOT EQUALS. If a child or adult have that attitude or mindset, I think an equality lesson needs to be taught. That what wrong in so many cases. Children think they are adults' peers. Many adults have supported this attitude. Adults have the right to discipline (Not Abuse) children. Spanking is a form of discipline just like time out. Adults don't have the right to spank other adults. Children don't have the right discipline children. I think that needs to be taught to everyone. Because if a male spanking a female child is teaching a male child to hit females we are in a world of trouble.

I don't want a man that abuses women to use that as a lame excuse for his actions. "My dad spanked my sister". "But did he hit your Mom a*k*a his equal"? "No"! "Exactly! Now Shut up with that Crap!"
Stop this attitude. I want hear that again. But Some feel spanked children grow up to be more aggressive adults. I know some people who can shoot that theory to hell.

Unfortunately those young ladies were bruised & the policy was not up held. But that should have stayed the focus of this case, instead spouting opinions about corporal punishments and domestic violence.

Male assistant principal shouldn't have spanked the female students because of school policy and the female students wouldn't have been bruised. Nothing more needed! But that my opinion, what's yours?

Saturday, November 12, 2011

Pervert & the Cowards

Sandusky---> McQueary---> Paterno---> Penn St Officials---> But not the Police

This Penn St sex scandal sickens me. Of course Sandusky is the worse for being the vile molester. But the rest of the names are not real men either. They are a bunch of COWARDS that passed the buck of Responsibility instead of doing right thing and going to the police themselves.

McQueary is the worse of these cowards. He saw it! So why didn't he get the police? What about vigilante justice for the child? He should have confronted Sandusky in the shower then and there and got the child to safety. The rest just dropped the ball (No Pun Intended). Amazing how these Old, Grown, Adult men could do that.

And the poor Penn St community. Who wants to go though this? I know the students hate that their beloved coach is gone & school is battling reporters & legal accusations. But I want them to consider hearing this about another school. SMH

*Talking to You in Grown Up*

Friday, November 11, 2011

Fat Butt News Broadcast

I hate News Cast that focus on obesity & being overweight. Not the facts & advice. The showing of people's faces, guts, & butts has to be embarrassing. Especially if somebody realize that their body part on TV. 8O Especially kids. Oh the horrible possibility. You're eating a cupcake or getting a milk. It gets on TV and then the next day your peers tease you. Is the media trying to shame people into losing weight?

I remember the first time I passed by someone in a mall & I was Aware I got "That Look".  I was secretly embarrassed. Then I was obsessed for about a month checking to see my bust, butt & legs on TV. I finally esteem checked myself & stopped. I wonder do others do that.

I really wish the Media would stop that. Has to be like Invasion of Privacy, somehow. Hope no one signed a release, especially not the parents of the kids.
I bet not see my body on TV on a report. It will be hell to pay.

*Talking to You in Grown Up*